“Covid” Is A Trojan Horse
Aug 27, 2022
The Sars-Cov-2 virus has never been purified and isolated.
“Covid” is a trojan horse. There is no pandemic, Covid or otherwise. There never was. People and healthcare professionals who are perpetuating the fallacy need to understand this.
All cause-mortality
Denis Rancourt has produced a massive paper and found no evidence of any viral outbreak.
All-cause mortality is the most accurate and most reliable scientific data for analysing the “Covid pandemic” because it doesn’t discriminate and it has no bias. After all, a death is a death. Either somebody died or somebody didn’t die.
People are being told to take a PCR test if they feel unwell and even if they don’t feel unwell. A positive result and you are in quarantine for ten days anyway, even if you didn’t have a sniffle. And it is the number of positive tests that the media endlessly report… and are used to fear monger mask mandates and lockdowns nationwide.
There is no evidence of a pandemic, as assessed by changes in all-cause mortality by week, in Canada, USA or Europe. Instead, the unprecedented spikes in deaths, where such occurred, is inconsistent with known characteristics of respiratory disease, but instead with official & societal responses to the WHO declaration of a pandemic of international concern.
Denis Rancourt on how medical negligence killed people.
EXCESS DEATHS WERE DUE TO THE RESPONSE (MIDAZOLAM/RESPIRATORY SUPPRESSING SEDATIVES+VENTILATORS) OR LACK OF TREATMENT FOR SEASONAL INFECTIONS INCLUDING BUT NOT EXCLUSIVELY DUE TO SARSCOV2.
If you look at deaths attributed to Covid19, or to pneumonia & influenza as a category, you’ll see the expected & reported peaks in the time after the WHO declaration. But attribution of cause of death is a difficult business. When people express disbelief & say “don’t you think doctors know what it was that killed someone”, recognise how difficult it is.
It’s not like the breakdown of a motor vehicle, where it’s usually possible to ascribe in detail what caused it to stop running. A death, especially in a frail, elderly person already chronically unwell with 3-4 other disorders, presents a complicated set of signs & symptoms.
It was well-recognised decades ago that once a pattern of attribution of cause of death is set in a region, that cause continues to be disproportionately attributed, even when retrospective analysis no longer supports it.
In this case, attribution is heavily contaminated by the absurd “with Covid19” rules & by the untrustworthy nature of the PCR test.
Therefore deaths ascribed to Covid19 are inherently of LOW QUALITY. Denis Rancourt takes us through this argument & explains why they’ve restricted their analysis to ALL CAUSE MORTALITY.
This data is of HIGH QUALITY. Unless the ACM statistics are being faked, they should show rises & falls by date & by age that fits the claim that a pandemic of a respiratory virus passed through a series of populations, killing the elderly & ill far more often than the younger & healthier. And they simply don’t.
There may have been an excess of mortality around March 2020, yet it is one huge step to attribute this excess mortality to a “novel” coronavirus instead of to a “novel approach of treating” pneumonias.
Denis Rancourt has co-authored yet another paper, COVID-Period Mass Vaccination Campaign and Public Health Disaster in the USA
Covid19 doesn’t exist… What are we looking for?
And here we hit upon the next major problem, all-cause mortality data shows no viral outbreak in 2020.
Ok, maybe all-cause mortality shows “Covid19” wasn’t the killer we were told it was in 2020. What therefore is “Covid-19”?
Even if you now understand Covid-19 not to be the killer were told it was, it is still important to understand that ‘Covid19’ simply doesn’t exist.
There is nothing new about the symptoms that people have. For any disease to be identifiable it needs to have a unique combination of features, that make it distinguishable from other diseases.
However, there are no specific symptoms for Covid-19 “for most respiratory diseases there are no unmistakable specific symptoms. Therefore, a differentiation of the different pathogens is purely clinically impossible” Thomas Loscher, infectious disease physician. Even the loss of smell and taste can not be called a new symptom.
With the absence of disease-specific features, what is actually being tested for?
SarsCov2 virus has never been isolated
COVID-19 is purportedly caused by the Sars-Cov-2 virus.
What the WHO, the media and government health officials have been calling the ‘Sars Cov2 virus’ simply does not exist either, medically or empirically. The WHO and CDC have admitted as much when scientists demanded to see a sample of it. There IS NO proof that it exists because it has never been isolated or purified in a lab. The whole Wuhan lab leak story is a distraction.
However there is no published scientific proof showing a virus has been isolated from a COVID patient. Not a single one.
‘Sarscov2’, is just an invention:
- The virus has not been purified and isolated. There is no real-world evidence of SARS-CoV-2 using the Scientific Method (which is completely ignored in pharmaceutical science) rather than computer models.
- Even if it had been it still wouldn’t determine disease causality. If the claim is that SARS-CoV-2 causes COVID-19, then tests must be conducted to show causality and must be reproducible.
- Reproducibility is critical, it being part of the Scientific Method. If the same results can’t be repeated, then the hypothesis is false.
- Finally, an examination of the scientific literature has found no evidence of any deadly viruses, let alone SARS-CoV-2.
Andrew Kaufman is a Medical Doctor, Psychiatrist, and Molecular Biologist who received his training and degrees from Duke University, MIT, and South Carolina Medical University. He says there are no such things as “viruses” and the “Coronavirus Global Pandemic” is a “manufactured event.”
The CDC Acknowledges that SARS-CoV-2 has not been Isolated.
The official CDC document, (dated July 21, 2021) entitled “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel reads as follows:
Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed [January 2020] and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.
What is this ‘virus’, then? It is a chimeric, engineered code made up of Sars Cov 1, animal viruses and HIV. It appears as a computer code on a database. That’s it. All the ‘variants’ we are constantly bombarded with are pure lies, made up to…you guessed it…make us take the ‘vaccines’.
If there is no Covid pandemic was the whole thing nothing more than a propaganda campaign?
The PCR Test
Ok, so what is the PCR test testing for?
The PCR test is unspecific yet it has been promoted as “gold standard" by the media and huge numbers of tests have been performed results in draconian measures for anyone who tests positive whether they have symptoms or not.
The PCR test is only designed to detect fragments of genetic information that is not exclusive to any one virus. It does not detect a “disease” called COVID-19. Antibody tests cannot be valid for the same reason.
We have a pandemic of PCR testing. If there were no PCR test there would be no “pandemic”
PCR tests for a specific RNA pattern found on a nasal swab. PCR does not test for disease or illness, it doesn’t tell you if you are sick. The Nobel Prize-winning inventor of the process never intended it to be used as a diagnostic tool, and said so publicly:
Kary Mullis
PCR tests are known to produce a lot of false-positive results, by reacting to genetic material that is not specific:
- A Chinese study found the same patient’s could get two different results from the same test on the same day.
- In Germany, tests are known to have reacted to common cold viruses.
- A 2006 study found PCR tests for one virus responded to other viruses too.
- In 2007, reliance on PCR tests resulted in an “outbreak” of Whooping Cough that never actually existed.
- Some tests in the US even reacted to the negative control sample.
- The late President of Tanzania, John Magufuli, submitted samples goat, pawpaw and motor oil for PCR testing, all came back positive for the virus.
- In February of 2020 experts were admitting the test was unreliable. Dr Wang Cheng, president of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences told Chinese state television “The accuracy of the tests is only 30-50%”.
- The Australian government’s own website claimed “There is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available COVID-19 tests.”
- A Portuguese court ruled that PCR tests were “unreliable” test for Sars-Cov-2 and should not be used for diagnosis and therefore any enforced quarantine based on those test results is unlawful.
- The World Health Organization (Twice) Admitted PCR tests produced false positives. In December 2020 WHO put out a briefing memo on the PCR process instructing labs to be wary of high CT values causing false-positive results: when specimens return a high CT value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.
- Then, in January 2021, the WHO released another memo, this time warning that “asymptomatic” positive PCR tests should be re-tested because they might be false positives: when specimens return a high CT value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.
How did the PCR test become a diagnostic tool?
- The genome of the Sars-Cov-2 virus was supposedly sequenced by Chinese scientists in December 2019, then published on January 10th 2020.
- Less than two weeks later, German virologists (Christian Drosten et al.) had allegedly used the genome to create assays for PCR tests.
- They wrote a paper, Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR, which was submitted for publication on January 21st 2020, and then accepted on January 22nd. Meaning the paper was allegedly “peer-reviewed” in less than 24 hours. A process that typically takes weeks.
- Since then, a consortium of over forty life scientists has petitioned for the withdrawal of the paper, writing a lengthy report detailing 10 major errors in the paper’s methodology.
- They have also requested the release of the journal’s peer-review report, to prove the paper really did pass through the peer-review process. The journal has yet to comply.
- The Corman-Drosten assays are the root of every Covid PCR test in the world.
- If the paper is questionable, every PCR test is also questionable. Because like all medical tests, there need’s to be a comparison to a “gold standard” to determine their “sensitivity” and “specificity”..
So we now have
- No identifiable pandemic
- No distinguishable disease
- No identifiable cause of illness
- No valid diagnostic test
Yet the propaganda machine is perpetuating fear that perfectly healthy humans are bioweapons, based on a test that is not fit for purpose, for a disease that hasn’t been shown to exist, for which we must stick rods up ours and our children’s noses, isolate from loved ones, wear masks and now take an experimental jab in order to get our freedoms back?
In Conclusion
We have been lied to about everything regarding this pandemic. Neither is there any real scientific evidence that a pathogenic virus is the cause of this illness. The entire story is founded on unproven assumption, extrapolations carried out by computer models and tests which are not tests.
The Sars-Cov-2 virus has never been purified and isolated.
We have a pandemic of PCR testing. If there were no PCR test there would be no “pandemic”
The PCR test is unspecific yet it has been promoted as “gold standard by the media and huge numbers of tests have been performed results in draconian measures for anyone who tests positive whether they have symptoms or not.
The PCR test is only designed to detect fragments of genetic information that is not exclusive to any one virus. It does not detect a “disease” called COVID-19. Antibody tests cannot be valid for the same reason.
Sadly it seems the masses would rather obey so they can think themselves virtuous and leave the thinking to others.
This has allowed the lucrative germ-theory to be protected and misused by the Military Industrial Pharmaceutical Banking NGO Big-Tech Corporate Media Complex.
Further Reading
“The Contagion Myth” by Dr Thomas Cowan
“What really makes you ill” By Dawn Lester and David Parker
https://www.oraclefilms.com/kevincorbett
https://www.globalresearch.ca/statement-virus-isolation-sovi/5752738
